Rabindranath vs Our Thought
There is a fine line between the State and the Society, which is not of separation, but of unity by maintaining the distinctiveness, as the case between the real couple.
Rabindranath believed in maintaining this State and Society. Because he knew deeply that one day the State had emerged through Society. And it's something
people need, but not all people need. That's why Society is on top, the State must be behind. It is this Society that has nurtured people for thousands of years for
civilization. The State has only been supportive of him. But that's not as much in the whole world. As much as the dominance of socialism has been seen in the ancient
civilizations of India and China. According to Rabindranath, these two societies have stood as protectors of the people in all circumstances. In his words, "In the
swadeshi king, the king of the country went hand in hand with the kingdom, the foreign kings came and began to scuttle the throne - the looting and torture did not
diminish - but the country was self-defense because he had done his own thing. Food and clothing are all in your hands. In this way, the country was of the people of the
country, and the king was only in one part of it. As there is a crown on the head. ’ Society is much older than the State. His glands are also very intact. So, Society led
people to grow up as human beings where the king has gone to dominate, that is, in the west, the people have lost their own identity and the blood of Rabindranath has
become 47 d of Karbi. He was no longer a man. The State has swallowed him up. poet Just as the difference between State and Society is on a very fine line, so is the
difference between politics and social policy. Since this sub-continent (better known as India) grew up in the shadow of the affection of society, it was necessary to build
a state here by maintaining the power and difference between the society and the state. Politics didn't have to be all-encompassing either. Then, the society could have
come out of its own strength, throwing itself on the railway line of purity - on the straight path. On the other hand, if politics and social policy had maintained their subtle
differences, politics would not have been so all-consuming. Breaking up the society, he did not put an end to all the existence of man and bring it under the feet of the
state. In reality, the differences between the State and Society, and the difference between politics and social policy were not discussed or written in that way by anyone
except Kazi Abdul Odood in the post-Rabindra period. Therefore, by keeping Rabindranath’s society alive, this stream of politics separates the State from the
social policy - whether it was propagated in Rabindranath’s Bengal, in his greater India in this way.
On the contrary, the great multitude was much more impressed and went to Gandhi. They saw Gandhi moving forward by uniting politics and social reform. They saw
the liberation of the state and society in Gandhi’s charka cutting. Rabindranath, who was identified at that time, said, "Today, in our country, I have flown the
charkalanchhana flag. This is the flag of total material energy - there is no contribution of the power of the mind in it. An invitation to all nations on the path to
liberation cannot be an invitation to a blind repetition of an external process. It is necessary for him to open up full humanity - Is he driving this charka. Have we not,
for so long, kept the mind in the confines of materiality, confined to action, considering the thoughtless stupid external event as a way of achieving the divine
spiritual perfection? ’ In reality, when the development of intelligence in a society decreases, then inertia reigns. That is, everything in behavior then becomes big in
that society. And since society has been swallowed up by the state and politics, the
behavior, and the actions of the material intellect of the state and politics are then
allocated to that group of people. They then slowly move away from the life of the
intellect.
It cannot be said that the western politics that began in India or in this sub-continent
through the Congress, in which the highest importance was given to the life of the
intellect and to liberate it. Because it was on the top of society. There was only
the movement of English like ‘the jackal of the Brahmin’. Rabindranath used
Bengali instead of English at the Congress conferences in Rajshahi and Dhaka to
break it down. So that Congress has an alliance with the larger section of the
society. But he got condemnation instead of praise for him. The biggest slang for
Bengalis in his language were 'don't know English'.
In this gull, however, it was not possible to suppress Rabindranath or to remove him
so much. Because, in the house in which he grew up, Sahebi Qaeda was all there,
but the Bengali language and the culture of Bengali were of great importance. If his
father, Maharshi Debendranath, had known, someone had written a letter in English
instead of Bengali in that house. He wouldn't be happy. Moreover, his house, i.e.,
this Thakur house, has given the modernity that the Bengali society has been given
by three men, by maintaining everything in the society, only by reforming
superstition and adding modernity in harmony with the society, but it has not been
given any politics or state.
Sitting in the house of the society, as the greatest thinker of a thousand years of
Bengalis, the change that Rabindranath brought about in the minds of Bengalis, in
the culture of Bengalis, in the language of Bengalis, no state or politics could make.
On the contrary, the state today is hindering the propagation of this culture and mind
in society. Because, the politics of voting, the politics of power, the politics of
the royal servant, and above all, the politics of corruption is an ally of the state today.
Therefore, instead of the modern culture of The Bengalis created by the hand of
Rabindranath, all those state associates are providing all the resources so that
the backward religious culture spreads in the society. As a result, society has now
come to a standstill. According to Rabindranath, a state or society does not have to
be busy in the production of goods just like a merchant. He has to be engaged or
engaged in 'learning, in the discussion of the intellect, in the public interest, in the
creation of art literature, in the full development of humanity.' ’
When politics completely eliminate social policy, when the state completely breaks
down society and brings it under its own employees, what is the situation of that
community in reality? In reality, the state then grabs its piece and creates a bullocktaught bird. Who has to chant the superiority of the state and the king all the time?
There, no one can become better in society than the king. There, the king's
intellect is considered to be the best intelligence. The king there is the wise man.
And knowledge is exiled from society. On the other hand, all the purifications of the
society fall under the stick of the royal servant i.e., the king's kotwal. And then it is
not love, it is Pratap that grows up in society. Pratap can only give grief; he does
not have the power or the nature to give happiness like love. Therefore, in modern
states, instead of love, it is Pratap who always shouts and cries for sorrow. And
people are afraid of that sorrow.
After the birth of Rabindranath, we have built the state twice. We recognize
Rabindranath in the state. The whole of India does the subcontinent. Yet, across this
sub-continent, only the totalitarian form of the state is increasing day by day. Politics
has also become an unintelligent element of guiding people like group organisms.
It was the society that protected the people. The king was only crowned on his head.
It would have increased its appearance among the people a lot. That society has been
broken down not by the religion formed out of the forces within society, but by the
religion of the hereafter, the chains of the state, and the royal servants and political
party affiliations. So now there's a win of inertia everywhere. The victory of the
merchant's production. Humanity, education, learning, the discussion of the intellect,
from folklore to the creation of art literature, everything seems to be slowly folding
up.
0 মন্তব্যসমূহ